602029 SE Sozialphilosophie und Politische Philosophie II
summer semester 2023 | Last update: 02.08.2023 | Place course on memo list602029
SE Sozialphilosophie und Politische Philosophie II
SE 2
5
Block
every 2nd year
German
The seminar aims at elaborating the various understandings of recognition in order to critically discuss their contours
In recent decades, recognition has become a key concept in debates on social philosophy and political theory. Recognition is not merely an epistemological endeavor (the recognition of certain properties or facts); rather, the point is that it is through recognition that someone (e.g. a subject or a group) is first constituted in his/her being or status, i.e. recognized. And it is only through this act of (mutual) recognition that (egalitarian) possibilities of participation in social and political processes arise.
There is a whole series of diverse currents - such as phenomenology (Jean-Paul Sartre), postcolonial studies (Frantz Fanon), Marxism (Louis Althusser), psychoanalysis (Jessica Benjamin) and, above all, the more recent Frankfurt School (Axel Honneth) - that refer back to the concept of recognition, which was prominently introduced into the discussion by Rousseau and Hegel, and discuss it in a controversial way with regard to its subject-constitutive, social and political implications.
The term recognition is intensively discussed not least because it can be problematized in very different ways (cf. Honneth vs. Fraser, Honneth vs. Whitebook, Honneth vs. Rancière, or Honneth vs. Butler). Finally, a reciprocal understanding always entails identity-logical attributions and determinations of normality and thus threatens to level the otherness of the Other.
There is a whole series of diverse currents - such as phenomenology (Jean-Paul Sartre), postcolonial studies (Frantz Fanon), Marxism (Louis Althusser), psychoanalysis (Jessica Benjamin) and, above all, the more recent Frankfurt School (Axel Honneth) - that refer back to the concept of recognition, which was prominently introduced into the discussion by Rousseau and Hegel, and discuss it in a controversial way with regard to its subject-constitutive, social and political implications.
The term recognition is intensively discussed not least because it can be problematized in very different ways (cf. Honneth vs. Fraser, Honneth vs. Whitebook, Honneth vs. Rancière, or Honneth vs. Butler). Finally, a reciprocal understanding always entails identity-logical attributions and determinations of normality and thus threatens to level the otherness of the Other.
The individual texts will be prepared and evaluated in a "close reading".
seminar paper of 10 pages
Honneth, A.: Struggle for Recognition. Frankfurt 1992.
Ikäheimo, H. / Lepold, K. / Stahl, T. (eds.): Recognition and Ambivalence. New York 2021.
Siep L. / Ikäheimo, H. / Quante, M. (eds.): Handbuch Anerkennung. Wiesbaden 2021.
Ikäheimo, H. / Lepold, K. / Stahl, T. (eds.): Recognition and Ambivalence. New York 2021.
Siep L. / Ikäheimo, H. / Quante, M. (eds.): Handbuch Anerkennung. Wiesbaden 2021.
15.03.2023
Group 0
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Time | Location | ||
Wed 2023-03-15
|
12.00 - 13.30 | 4DG14 SR 4DG14 SR | ||
Thu 2023-03-16
|
17.15 - 18.45 | 40832 SR 40832 SR | Barrier-free | |
Wed 2023-03-22
|
12.00 - 13.30 | 4DG14 SR 4DG14 SR | ||
Thu 2023-03-23
|
17.15 - 18.45 | 40832 SR 40832 SR | Barrier-free | |
Wed 2023-03-29
|
12.00 - 13.30 | 4DG14 SR 4DG14 SR | ||
Thu 2023-03-30
|
17.15 - 18.45 | 40832 SR 40832 SR | Barrier-free | |
Fri 2023-03-31
|
13.45 - 19.00 | 4DG14 SR 4DG14 SR | ||
Sat 2023-04-01
|
09.00 - 13.30 | 4DG14 SR 4DG14 SR |